Jonathan Matthew Holland
Mr. Andrew Smith
English 1020
April 8, 2009
What about us?
As students, we are expected to follow the guidelines others have set up for us. What about the students that do not fit into the perfect cookie cutter view of what an education should be? Should these students be punished because they go about learning in a different way? When should we allow the students to excel at things such as the arts or sports if we remove them because they are not part of our country’s prescribed core curriculum? For many, the thought’s of sitting through a day of boring classes is not welcome. In the essay “Hidden Intellectualism,” Professor and writer, Gerald Graff, demonstrates how being book smart is not always a desired feat. Graff uses his own personal experiences in designing a way for those students that do not excel at the core, math science, history, and English, classes to excel in learning through things that they are interested in.
With ideas such as our “No Child Left Behind” program, students that have a different way of learning are subject to get over it and try to fit their cylindrical peg into America’s rigid rectangle. While discussing the idea of street smarts versus book smarts, Gerald Graff believes: “We associate the educated life, the life of the mind, too narrowly and exclusively with subjects and texts that we consider inherently weighty and academic” (142). The inclusion of students with street smarts into the academic world can aid in the understanding of experiences that help to broaden our view of the academic texts that we come into contact with. Some students do excel in this mold of education, but what about the others that would rather be learning about sports or theatre or music? These students just have to deal with it mostly due to the strict guidelines that they must follow in order to graduate. Would you rather sit through a boring statistics class trying to decide the best way to make a bee line to the door when the bell rings, or would you rather be out at the baseball game counting up your favorite teams batting statistics? Clearly, for most street smart kids, the answer would be the more exciting and invigorating one. Graff suggests this when he says that, “Making students nonacademic interests an object of study is useful then, for getting students’ attention and overcoming their boredom and alienation” (147). This helps to distract students from the harder and more boring subjects by applying what they are studying to something that they may enjoy in the real world.
When did school stop catering towards the future and just become a boring day to day chore that every young person must be a part of? In a recent survey of an eleventh grade advanced placement English class at Cookeville High School, I found that while many of the students appreciate the effort of their teachers that try to incorporate the eight different multiple intelligences.[1] Sadly, I also gathered that these same students do not believe that many of their teachers achieve enough of these intelligences in the other classes that they are in. For example, while reading a story about a baseball game in a third grade class, the desks have been arranged so that the teacher can have demonstrations of the different movements that pertain to the baseball game. At the beginning of the story, the teacher has a couple of volunteers imitate the pitch of the first pitch and the crack of the bat as the ball connects with the bat. Next, he has a student act as if he needs to slide into the base so that he would be safe from being out. By including activities such as this the students with street smarts can express themselves while the book smart students may have the option to take turns reading part of the story that is being acted out.
Students nowadays have even less of a chance to voice their opinions on how they want to learn and definitely do not have any way of deciding what they want to learn in most classrooms. The amounts of teachers that allow their students to make decisions are few and far between, because most of them are just trying to wade through the multitudes of paperwork that comes with teaching students. Because of the ridiculous amounts of paperwork, teachers lose their passion and lose the needed focus on their students. Due to this the students as a whole lose out on education but those that need the most help due to the fact that they are not “book smart,” lose out more than the others. A current example of this would be the inclusion of a graduation test in Florida that Governor Bush instituted, which requires students to pass a test that says whether they are allowed to graduate or if they have to be held back for another year to take the year over even if they have good grades going into the test.
Our Nation has figured out that college isn’t for everyone, why can’t education figure this out? Just as the music industry caters to the tastes of everyone, should not education? Graff defends his beliefs once again by saying, “I believe that street smarts beat out book smarts in our culture not because street smarts are non-intellectual, as we generally suppose, but because they satisfy an intellectual thirst more thoroughly than school culture which seems pale and unreal” (146). It has been proven that everyone does not learn the same way so schools should use this information to better the learning experience for everyone.
In conclusion, kids that are more street smart than book smart are shown a great disservice by our education system. They are expected to learn in the same ways that everyone else does even though they are more interested in fashion or sports or the arts. Assignments that students are given should allow them more freedom in subject matter so that they will not grow to resent learning and be able to discuss something that they care about. Students should be able to have a say in how they learn and what does or does not work for them. As Graff has described in his essay “Hidden Intellectualism,” students should be given the chance to show what they are passionate about while they are meeting the requirements that must be met by state standards.
Works Cited
Graff, Gerald. “Hidden Intellectualism.” They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter In Academic Writing. Cathy Birkenstein and Gerald Graff. New York. WW Norton, 2006. 142-148.
[1] The eight multiple intelligences in children are linguistics, logical/mathematical, special, bodily/kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, and intrapersonal. These show a student’s strongest and weakest ways that they are able to learn. These multiple intelligences can be used for any age child in school.
